-
Less Paperwork for the MW Deployment Offer
Suggested by Jami Styx – Completed – 1 Comments
For the MW Deployment Offer is there a way to consolidate the paperwork? Right now, partners must enter (copy & paste) some of the customer information 4 times (voucher #, entity name, tenant ID, email etc.)
For example:
1) I generate info into the initial SOW
2) Then I have to submit the initial SOW into the portal. The portal requires that I enter the voucher #, customer name and tenant ID # that is already in the SOW. Additionally, I have to populate the Program Membership, why can’t it just auto populate? I only have one program?
3) Then I copy and paste the same information from the SOW over to POE
4) Then for the 4th time I required to re-enter information (voucher #, entity name, tenant ID, email etc.) into portal coping and pasting the info again from the SOW and POE for final submissions.
A lot of coping and pasting of the same information over and over.
Is there any way this can flow into Partner Center (PC) where it can be more automated like other program such as AMM or the MCI offers. Yes, we may have to submit the initial information, but the tool would allow us to add information such as voucher #, entity name, tenant ID, email & load SOW initially to a claim. Then when engagements is completed, like other programs such as AMM and MCI it allows partners to send consent emails (directly from PC) as POE which would be great replacement for the final POE document. -
Add a Column to display the HWM value for each Workload in the FastTrack Insights
Suggested by Aaron Alpha – Completed – 3 Comments
Can a column (non-calculated) be added int he FastTrack Insights area to reference the High-Water mark dollar value for each workload per user value under the FY23 program e.g. Intune -- $1, MDE -- $3 and so on. -
Customer Referral Notes History Difficult to Read
Suggested by Oscar Goco – Completed – 3 Comments
Going to Partner Center > Insights > FastTrack > Referrals > customer name > Notes History, it shows the notes with no formatting:NOTE: replaced customer information with xxxxx characters"10/30/2023 - xxxx@microsoft.com RFA # 83643. 10/30/2023; Request approved for Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management. Assigned to FTCQ FRP • EDU Licenses: No• Nonprofit Licenses: No• Non-FRP Engaged: No• FRP involved: No• GCC: No Partner/MCS listed in RFA: false Contacts: • Customer contact information: xxxxx.xxxx, IT Administrator, xxxxx.xxxxx@contoso.com, 18001234567 • Requestor contact information: xxxxx, IT Administrator, xxxxx@contoso.com, 1801234567 Service Location and Language: • City: xxxxxx• State: Illinois• Country: united states• FT Supported Language: english (united states) The following entitlement counts reflect the entitlements confirmed by the RFA eligibility engine. These entitlements may differ from FTOP due to latency or other issues but please move forward with the RFA based on the eligibility verified by the On-Demand Team. RFA Approved Workloads: • Purview DLM: xxxx Entitlements RFA name: Request M365 assistance: Email retention policy setup Additional information that may impact the project: We plan on implementing Email retention polices for the company and need help to ensure we are setting them up correctly. RFA Form URL: "An improved formatting would make this information easier to read:10/30/2023 -xxxxxx@microsoft.com
RFA # . 10/30/2023; Request approved for Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management.Assigned to FTCQ FRP
• EDU Licenses: No
• Nonprofit Licenses: No
• Non-FRP Engaged: No
• FRP involved: No
• GCC: NoPartner/MCS listed in RFA: falseContacts:
• Customer contact information: xxxxx, IT Administrator, xxxxxxx@contoso.com, 18001234567
• Requestor contact information: xxxxx, IT Administrator, xxxxxxx@contoso.com, 18001234567Service Location and Language:
• City: xxxxx
• State: Illinois
• Country: united states• FT Supported Language: english (united states)The following entitlement counts reflect the entitlements confirmed by the RFA eligibility engine. These entitlements may differ from FTOP due to latency or other issues but please move forward with the RFA based on the eligibility verified by the On-Demand Team.RFA Approved Workloads:• Purview DLM: xxxx Entitlements
RFA name: Request M365 assistance: Email retention policy setupAdditional information that may impact the project: We plan on implementing Email retention polices for the company and need help to ensure we are setting them up correctly. RFA Form URL: -
Verbiage in Referral AU% tab incorrect
Suggested by Oscar Goco – Completed – 2 Comments
When reviewing the customer referral in Partner Center > Insights > FastTrack > Referrals > customer name > AU% tab. The screen states:"There is currently no Active Usage Data for this tenant.To view the Active Usage Data, please visit the FRP Dashboard"Going to the Partner's FRP Dashboard, the customer is not even listed thus no AU data is available.I suspect this is because the partner does not have an approved CPOR association to view the Active Usage data.If so, the verbiage should state that the AU% is not available until a CPOR association is established.However, it would be best to have the AU% data available and visible to provide insight to the customer deployment status. -
Referral process improvements
Suggested by David Nudelman – Completed – 2 Comments
The referral process is telling a customer, that we have been engaged for a long time and have CPOR for the workloads in question, that we are not endorsed for these workloads. If we have a CPOR claim, the process should stop there, the customer gets referred back to us. Also, during the request the customer asked us t be the designated partner. That should also bypass the referral workflow that is in place now. We were always told that the customer has the right to choose their partner. I believe the correct order should be:CPORWhat the customer wantsThe referral workflowAlso you should improve the language used in the program, it sounds very negative to partners. Customers new to FT with no valid CPOR claim should go straight to #3. -
FPR - Steeves and Associates
Suggested by Lily Cui – Completed – 3 Comments
Endorsement model: Smaller partners are not able to obtain as many Endorsements even though they may be qualified to do the work. Steeves and Associates is an example of this where they have strong competencies and can deliver in many workloads, however they only qualify for ACM. -
Reporting on Front Line Worker Teams in Partner Center and/or FRP Dashboard
Suggested by Garrison Rose – Completed – 1 Comments
Reporting on Front Line Worker Teams in Partner Center and/or FRP Dashboard -
Communication of change in benefit FY23/24
Suggested by RONNIE ALTIT – Completed – 2 Comments
Communication of change in benefit FY23/24
-
FT voucher redemption form
Suggested by Sebastian Baca – Completed – 3 Comments
Having to submit all vouchers via the M365 Portal creates a HUGE bottleneck for a company the size of Avanade.
We have sellers al over that need to utilize these vouchers, and we cannot grant access to the portal to everyone (as the process is not very straight forward and requires additional approval from both sides).Are there plans to revert back to the old way of using the form to submit?
-
Customer Eligibility for M365 Customer Success Offer
Suggested by Pavan Verma – Completed – 2 Comments
Hi Team,M365 Customer Success Offer - Customers who own Office 365 licenses (E1, E3 and E5) are matched with an eligible FastTrack Ready Partner (FRP) and are granted the right to receive a voucher with a maximum value.But how partner get to know if any of our existing customers are eligible for this offer or not, It would be great if this insight is available so that we can connect with Microsoft Team for the nominating eligible clients.
FPC Program ideas/suggestions
Share insights/feedback, ideas and requests related to the FRP Program.