Program Tools (non OSU) ideas/suggestions

It would be beneficial to be able to see if Security ACR is high or low from a usage standpoint. This will allow a security focused partner to drive MSFT security usage all MW security and Azure based. 

We would like to request the addition of a "Select All" option to the Change Columns feature in the Customer Detail area of ASPX Views (Copilot Opportunities, E3 Opportunities, E5 Opportunities, and E5 Expansion Opportunities). A partner regularly download Customer Detail data from each view and typically require all available columns. Currently, they must manually check every column before downloading, which is repetitive and time-consuming. Introducing a "Select All" function would significantly reduce this manual effort and improve efficiency for partners.

We would like to request the addition of a column in the Customer Details section of Copilot Opportunities Insights that shows the growth potential for Copilot Chat. This potential can be calculated by subtracting the current Copilot Chat MAU from the total number of M365/O365 SKUs the customer owns. Partners use this metric to assess whether to propose Copilot + Power Accelerate to a customer. Having this data available in MPX would enable faster decision-making and help drive deeper engagement with Copilot + Power Accelerate.

Please add a per‑tenant graph that shows the trend of MAU for each tenant. (similar to “Copilot Usage by Product,” but available per tenant across all products) Currently, MPX does not provide visibility into MAU trends. Partners need to view MAU trends over periods such as the past 3 or 6 months to understand how customers are engaging with products. This insight helps them identify customers with strong intent, allowing for more accurate prioritization.

Refresher needed regarding ASPX data sharing both internal and external with partners. Would like to have formal guidance to ensure we stay compliant with corp rules.

We need to know if the utilizing FRP MXP Dashboard to do MCI workshop through Eligible MCI lead to upsell.Currently there's no visibility except to know that. PSM ask manually to partner what deal happened, which MCI worshop that comes from the deal. It leads to very long time because There are multiple layer and many team involved ( might ask CSM need to ask AE/ Ask regional alliance manager, need to check in country/account level)The FRP doing the workshop might be different than the one close the deal, potentially not aware Having dashboard showing possibility ofWhich workshop completed by partnerWhich customer completed workshop by tenant ID and if there's license purchase to trackInclude Tenant Purchase align with Completed Workshop list in the PSM Dashboard

When presenting to Wakers partner the different scenarios in MPX (ASPX) to drive Secure AI Productivity, Security and Copilot upsell opportunities and when checking the End date of the Subscriptions (they are not an LSP, and they do not have access to EA renewal date), they noticed a potential improvement that could be added to the tool.They mentioned some customers have automatic renewal enabled for their licenses, so for this type of contract, it is not useful to check the End date of the Subscription and initiate specific actions on customer side to secure the renewal. They would like to see this option ("Auto Renew Opt-in") flagged in the Subscriptions page. *The “Auto Renew Opt-In” must be selected before the contract is signed to activate automatic renewal. Business Impact: Reduce the efforts of the Partner Sales Teams to get in touch with customers prior to renewal and drive renewal conversation while the renewal will be done however automatically.  Help the partner prioritize even better the customers who need to be targeted for renewal conversations. 

Request to Include CSP Revenue to PIIR in PSM Dashboard to measure the partner contribution across CSP deals

Request to Include Customer Sub Segments in all Reports (MPX and others)

Context:Global Go-To-Market (GTM) initiatives (Copilot Chat Accelerate) are designed at a worldwide scale but require adaptation and execution at the regional level. The process of translating these global strategies into actionable regional plans is often complex, involving multiple stakeholders, local market nuances, and alignment with regional partner capabilities. This complexity can lead to delays and inconsistencies in execution.Insight:Landing global GTM initiatives in regions is frequently messy and time-consuming. Regional teams must interpret, localize, and operationalize global directives, which can result in misalignment, duplicated efforts, and confusion among partners about priorities and available resources. The need to coordinate across time zones, languages, and business cultures further complicates the process.Impact:The slow and uneven execution of global GTM initiatives at the regional level can delay market impact, reduce the effectiveness of partner programs, and hinder the achievement of business targets. Partners experience uncertainty or lack of clarity, leading to missed opportunities and suboptimal use of available incentives and resources.