Program Tools (non OSU) ideas/suggestions

For global partners it would be very helpful if there would be a downloadable voucher earnings statement that would contain complete earnings for all location IDs. The Power BI statement under Partner Statement Report · FastTrack Partner Community Portal is nice, but as global admin I would have to drill into every single location ID which makes working with the earnings report very clumsy. Would be great to have a consolidated view across all location Ids.... Thank you! :) 

Problem statement: FPX currently shows the number of available workshops but not the specific eligible workshops. Impact: Users need to click to see eligibility, which is inefficient. Measurement: Improved user efficiency and satisfaction.

Problem statement: Need to show EDU customers and SKUs in Insights.Specific process/tool/data: FPXImpact: EDU customers and SKUs not visible.Measure impact: Improved visibility of EDU data.

Problem statement: Need functionality to select one MCI engagement and see a list of all eligible customers.Specific process/tool/data: FPXImpact: Unable to create targeted campaigns efficiently.Measure impact: Increased campaign success rate. 

Some partners are organized via industry segments, and it would be valuable to have an industry filter in ASPX. Less manual labor on the partner side to pull customer industry targets. 

Following an ASPX training session delivered to Projetlys partner, they mentioned that they would like to see in ASPX opportunity table the name of the person who submitted the CPOR claim from their side. In theory, the person who submitted the CPOR claim is also the Project Manager (the owner of the customer project). And when exporting ASPX data, this would allow better partner follow-up, and will allow them to assign each customer opportunity to the accountable person. Just FYI, started the API conversation but they are not ready yet for full API integration. 

Many partner feedback to add formal names to workloads in ASPX such as DLM P1. Partner unable to interpret without going to Learn. Impact ability to scale across teams who do not know formal workload name.

When adding an idea in PRM under account details/Ideas. Click new, add new information. Under Author, enter name and name does not resolve. Upon multiple attempts it appears to work intermittently. Impact ability to submit feedback and insights in PRM. Can test with my name Dan Will.

Softchoice is deprioritizing Microsoft Immersion Briefings because: 1. Programmatic ConstraintsParticipant Cap: Microsoft’s Immersion Briefings limit sessions to 35 companies, while Softchoice’s Customer Immersion Experiences (CIEs) often host 50–150 customers. This cap makes the program less scalable for their engagement model.Environment Requirement: The mandate to use Microsoft’s environment for Immersion Briefings was seen as unnecessary because customers already have access to the needed environment for Copilot Chat. 2. Survey & Proof of Execution (POE) IssuesDual Surveys: Microsoft requires its own survey in addition to Softchoice’s, which leads to low response rates and extra friction for customers.POE Flexibility: Softchoice wants Microsoft to accept partner-led survey data for POE, but this is not yet confirmed.3. Misalignment with Softchoice’s ModelSoftchoice has a mature one-to-many CIE program that scales better and aligns with their go-to-market strategy. Immersion Briefings feel restrictive compared to their established approach.4. Strategic FocusSoftchoice is prioritizing broad Copilot Chat engagement (upsell, cross-sell, net new) over program-specific targets like QuickStart or Immersion Briefings. They want flexibility to execute at scale and demonstrate impact through their own metrics.