Share insights/feedback, ideas and requests related to the FRP Program.
  • 7

    Microsoft Demo eXperiences | Expansion of demo tenant offerings

    Suggested by Stephen Brown New  0 Comments

    Hello, Are there any plans to expand the demo tenant offerings available on the Microsoft Demo eXperiences (MDX) site to include newer solutions such as Microsoft 365 Copilot, Entra Suite, Intune Suite, and others. Having access to demo environments for these products would be incredibly valuable for us. It would allow our team to gain hands-on experience with setup and configuration, which in turn would help us deliver more effective walkthroughs and demonstrations of the associated ADGs. Thank you
  • 3

    1 Click Preformatted Reports

    Suggested by Jeremy Deschner New  1 Comments

    My idea would be for me to have a way to quicky get a preformatted report from Partner Center within 1 click.  Currently I go to the Partner Center page and gather data for my sales team. The sales team doesn't have access so I provide them with the information on existing customers that are ready for any MCI, SCI, E3, or E5 upgrades. Currently I have to select the area in Partner Center that I want to export. Then it processes into a CSV file. I then download the CSV file. I have to open Excel use Get Data and point it to the CSV. After that, I have to click on Transform Data and the screen switches to the Data Screen where I can set the values for each cell. For example, Customer Is Eligible the value may be set to 1 or ineligible may be set to 2. However on my report I want the word Eligible or Ineligible so I se that on this screen.After all that I have to close and import the data into Excel. From there I have to use the existing data to create a Pivot table to group all the like data together. This would be more efficient if that was all done on the backend and what I download is an editable Excel sheet. Just have a basic template with all the data logically sorted and let the user be able to edit it so they can change whatever they need on their time. This would be so helpful and save massive amounts of editing time.
  • 3

    NCE Customer Eligibility

    Suggested by Jami Styx New  0 Comments

    As partners and Microsoft focus on moving customers to NCE contracts at renewal, is Microsoft considering allowing customers renewing from EA into NCE to be eligible for the MW Security Deployment Offer voucher program? We have several opportunities where we are working with Microsoft on renewals and encouraging customers to move to NCE, which disqualifies them from the voucher program. These customers are renewing from M365 E3 to M365 E5 and need assistance with deploying security products and would be a great fit for the deployment voucher.
  • 3

    QTM MW and Security Deployment Vouchers

    Suggested by Karen Naidoo Needs Votes  1 Comments

    Please add an option to add multiple files when submitting our claims. Often you revert to us to ask for the sign log. Will causes a delay in approval. We could submit the sign log together with the signed document. 
  • 2

    Partner guidance for the new FY26 expectations for migration scenarios

    Suggested by Loredana Munteanu Accepted  0 Comments

    In FY26, SharePoint and Exchange workloads have been removed from the scope of the FastTrack benefit. As a result, partners are no longer expected to support customers with migration prerequisites, such as readiness assessments. To ensure clarity around the updated requirements, it would be great to develop a concise OnePager or a formal Knowledge Base article. This resource should outline the FY26 changes, include visual aids, and guide partners on how to position their value-added services (VAS) and assist customers in initiating their migration projects.
  • 2

    QTM MW and Security Deployment Vouchers - Redemption in Partner Center?

    Suggested by Tim Van Liew Rejected  1 Comments

    We are a global company that manages FastTrack centrally. We recently received questions from our teams in Germany and Australia about redeeming Deployment Vouchers. We confirmed we could, but now have to figure out the Accounting on the back end for the payments. It would be better if we could redeem these vouchers through Partner Center where we already have Partner IDs and Payment and Tax profiles set up for these various markets. Is there a reason that Workshops are managed through the MCI portal and Partner Center, but Vouchers have to be managed in the FastTrack Partner Community Portal?
  • 1

    CPOR - please renaming Security Usage Incentive in PartnerCenter

    Suggested by Michiel Gedopt Rejected  0 Comments

    We need to log CPOR for program performance. We have clients that decline to complete the POE for CPOR because we are claiming Copilot or other Modern Workloads all because in partnercenter currently CPOR of Modern work or Security workloads is called Security Usage Incentive this is confusing for the client! please rename the partnercenter ability to CPOR to something more generic like CPOR for Modern Work/Security or something but not only "Security Usage Incentive"     many thanks
  • 1

    Automated referral feedback

    Suggested by Voice of FPC New  0 Comments

    Why not have automated forms sent out to partners after a certain period of time to provide feedback on a referral? 
  • 0

    Workshops CSP>EA>CSP

    Suggested by Alan Kyte New  0 Comments

    View from Partner (CloudEdge).The problem lies in the measurement model. If a customer decides not to upgrade to E5, the partner is at risk of being paused.We believe this misses the point: we won’t nominate a customer for a workshop unless we’re certain they’re upgrading to E5, which causes missed opportunities.We have a clear example with a customer named "ISRACARD", with 5,000 users currently on E3. Many products are not deployed, so they’re not eligible for EA Security. Microsoft refuses to make any exceptions. The customer will purchase their licenses under an EA agreement—not through us.As a Security partner, we have no incentive to push them toward E5. The LAR partner cannot demonstrate the value of E5 to the customer. This is a credit card company—they absolutely need E5, and we know how to show them the risks and capabilities involved. That’s our expertise.
  • 0

    Lack of Post-Summit Accountability in CSU Security Program

    Suggested by Josh Elmore New  0 Comments

    Subject: Partners participating in CSU security summits report strong initial engagement but minimal follow-up from Microsoft teams after events. For example, while RCG provided warm intros and weekly cadence, other segments like SLED lacked structured follow-through, leaving partners without clear next steps. Recommend implementing a standardized post-summit engagement model with defined accountability for CSU and account teams.Impact: Improves partner confidence, accelerates usage-driving motions, and ensures summit investments translate into measurable outcomes.Program: CSU Security ProgramRecap: BlueVoyant:Microsoft - FRP ROB/MBR Thursday, October 16 | Meeting | Microsoft Teams
Suggest a new idea