Program Tools (non OSU) ideas/suggestions

Previous Post on Yammer:

We thought we should share this with the rest of the partner community. We have raised a ticket in relation to this issue with FRPhelp and the data and Tools team is reviewing the following.

We have found that the S2500 customers are being identified or tracked using TPID. The problem is in a scenario where multiple customers share the same TPID, all of these customers are being flagged as S2500 customer. For example, we currently have one S2500 customer in an industry vertical and as it shares the same TPID with 15 other tenants, they are all being flagged as an S2500. We have reached out to most of the accounts team and got confirmation from them that not all of them are considered S2500 customers, rather the parent tenant is the S2500 customer.

We know we are not being measured on this currently, however, the non S2500 customers are skewing the data health results and also creating a bit of confusion on who the actual S2500 customers. In our opinion, FTOP should not be flagging child tenants of S2500 customers as a 'S2500' customer.

We don´t have access of the Portal informations Claims, we don´t have access to basics information kind of MAU evolutioin´s customer We can´t to see how te be the status of the customer. We lost a lot of access data that has not yet returned and this is causing great difficulties for our relationship with Microsoft customers.

In the Partner Center dashboard, we can provide customer-based workshop eligibility control. However, we cannot quickly and practically see which customers are eligible for which workshop. For this reason, encountering a customer screen on a workshop basis will make our work practical.

Since moving from FTOP to FCU, we have lost visibility to the usage across the customer's tenant when a new RFA is received. Our understanding is that once a successful CPOR claim is made, only after a certain period (8 days) will we get visibility to the utilisation of all the other workloads (where CPOR hasn't been claimed by another partner). This means we don't get the insights into the customer's usage till much later into the FastTrack engagement. Is the gateway team able to provide a snapshot of the usage across the tenant in the RFA notes? This will give us insights and better prepare for the kickoff and see what other conversations we can have to drive adoption across the tenant. This information used be available to us in FTOP - service usage reports prior to the move to FCU.

Please add an export function to the list of Tenants. We use Tenant workloads details as an input source to our sales campaign application to drive partner services collaboration on under-/unused workloads.