This forum is to submit insights/feedback and requests for new items or modifications to existing readiness materials, training videos and documentation. 
  • 2

    Update content - 4 year old

    Suggested by Dean Gross Rejected  2 Comments

    https://m365-specialty-partner.powerappsportals.com/knowledgebase/article/KB-01067/en-us has a link to FastTrack for Azure service-level description which has a page that is 4 years old. I doubt that is still accurate.
  • 2

    Update needed to KA-01129

    Suggested by Steve Olson Completed  1 Comments

    Please add the following language to the beginning of KA-01129:

    Mergers and acquisitions can be complicated for partners.  Partners have important decisions to make, and those decisions have consequences.  Because planning, communication, and irreversible decisions need to be made, please have the FPM loop in the RPM as soon as possible.
  • 2

    Updated Customer Facing Deck

    Suggested by Sean Denton Completed  1 Comments

    Hey Team,

    It has been a while since we have had any updated deck describing the workloads and description of guidance provided around the workloads. I have asked our FPM and it seems that the most recent one is very outdated and missing workloads. Is this something that is on the roadmap or something that has been released and I just have not been able to access. Please let me know if available or when an updated one will be available.
  • 2

    Fast Track Playbook | Error

    Suggested by Husain Jassat Completed  2 Comments

    I am trying to gain access to the task links for Microsoft Cloud App Security in the Microsoft Fast Track Playbook. However each time I click the link to get access it shows me an error.

    Task – 4207 / Task Links – MCAS Deployment Guide and Deployment Checklist.
    https://partner-docs.microsoft.com/partner-site/playbook/task-details.html#4208-mcas---configure-full-suite-e5

     
  • 2

    Skype to Teams Transition Overview {Playbookの資料が表示できない}

    Suggested by JBS FRP Team Rejected  1 Comments

    FastTrack Ready Partner Hub上のPlaybookの下記資料をクリックするとエラー表示になり、ファイルが閲覧できません。
    FrP側で表示できない場合、ファイルがそもそもないのか、FrPのみ表示できないのか判断が付かないため、分かるようにしていただきたいです。
    ※FPMの方は閲覧できるそうで、資料自体は共有いただきました。

    ■対象ファイル:Skype to Teams Transition Overview
    ■エラーメッセージ:このページは現在機能していません
    fasttrack-docs.microsoft.com では現在、この要求を処理できません。
    HTTP ERROR 500
  • 2

    Localization request - increase content in Japanese (日本語の内容を増やしてほしいです。)

    Suggested by Miyuki Narita Completed  1 Comments

    [Translated] Currently, with Microsoft 365 Specialty Partner Hub, I'm looking into FastTrack.
    However, items that are supported in Japanese are FastTrack Playbook and Operations Guide are few and far between. I want to have a better understanding of FastTrack. To that end, including FastTrack Ready Partner academy, Please support Japanese content for items that do not yet support Japanese content.
    --
    現在、Microsoft 365 Specialty Partner Hubを利用して、
    FastTrackについて調べています。
    しかし、日本語対応されている項目が、
    FastTrack PlaybookとOperations Guideと少ないと思っています。
    私は、FastTrackについての理解をより深めたいと考えています。
    そのために、FastTrack Ready Partner Academyをはじめとした、
    まだ日本語対応していない項目の日本語対応をお願いいたします。
  • 2

    O365 & EMS Remediation Checklist Refresh

    Suggested by Husain Jassat Completed  3 Comments

    This has been on my radar for a while now, as I imagine it will be for many FRPS. 

    The current EMS/0365 Remediation Checklist which is accessed via the playbook, is now out of date. The dates/references are in the last year. 

    They do not contain any of the new workloads which have been introduced by the program. 

    Is there any guidance, on when refreshed Remediation Checklists will be released to partners?
  • 1

    Eligible Product Lists for All MCI Engagements with Revenue Performance Measurements

    Suggested by Mihai Dincu New  0 Comments

    Hello team,One of my partners shared today that it would be great to have the eligible product lists for the Cloud Endpoint Envisioning & PoC workshop, to know exactly what products will generate the revenue impact needed for the new MCI Performance measurements. While looking closer to this, I noticed that the Eligible Product List is available only for this EA Security Accelerate program (https://aka.ms/EASecurityAccelerateGuide). However, similar lists are missing from the main MCI Guide (https://aka.ms/incentivesguide) or from the Security Performance Measurements (https://assetsprod.microsoft.com/mpn/en-us/fy26-security-partner-investments-performance-measurements.pdf) and the Modern Work Performance Measurements (https://assetsprod.microsoft.com/mpn/en-us/fy26-modern-work-partner-investments-performance-measurements.pdf).It would be very helpful for partners and for us to include the full list of eligible products/SKUs for all MCI Engagements with revenue-based performance measurements directly in the respective performance guides. This should cover, at minimum, the following engagements:Copilot + Power Envisioning & PoCCopilot + Power Deployment AcceleratorSecure Productivity Envisioning & PoCCloud Endpoints Envisioning & PoCData Security Envisioning WorkshopThreat Protection Envisioning WorkshopHaving these lists in the official guides will help partners plan, deliver, and report on engagements more effectively, and ensure alignment with program requirements.Thank you for considering this feedback!  
  • 1

    FTP Community Yammer

    Suggested by Ana Rutar Completed  1 Comments

    Hi! I would suggest to organize and structure FTP Yammer community little bit more as I found it hard to search and find important information. Every day is some new information and post and it's impossible to find what is important to you, if you don't spend every day on Yammer. Maybe make segmentation of topics as: News; FTP office Hours, FT campaigns etc .. Just to distinguish a little bit more topics from one another to enable partners to find information that are relevant to them more quicker.
  • 0

    New MCI Metric Concerns

    Suggested by Lisa Samuel New  0 Comments

    Partner described the high-stakes nature of the new performance metrics, where partners must demonstrate sustained Copilot adoption over 12 months, and the risk of being paused if targets are not met, especially for smaller partners.  The risk of usage regression post baseline is a concern that can be due to customer out of business or org disruptions.  How will these be addressed? Can a high water mark post baseline at claim be considered?
Suggest a new idea