-
Change Log for FastTrack Microsoft Learn Page
Suggested by Stephen Brown – New – 1 Comments
Is it possible to include a change log whenever the FastTrack Microsoft learn page is updated? Changes and updates are made fairly frequently throughout the year (Products and Capabilities, Entra, Sentinel, Office 365 sections), but it is not really clear what has been updated. FastTrack Center Benefit for Microsoft 365 - FastTrack – Microsoft 365 | Microsoft Learn -
Tech Plus Since the partner can no longer access the service, I would like to create a separate portal where the service summary can be obtained にパートナーがアクセスできなくなったので、サービス概要書等を入手できるポータルを別途作成してほしい
Suggested by Chie Kawaguchi – Rejected – 2 Comments
Tech Plus にパートナーがアクセスできなくなったので、サービス概要書等を入手できるポータルを別途作成してほしい最新のサービスの概要書、技術要件書などが、FPMやPDM等に相談しないと入手できない。相談してもタイミングによっては、すぐ入手できなくて困る場合がある。ほしいデータとしては下記。今は Copilot とか AI 関連のサイトもあれば。Since partners no longer have access to Tech Plus, I would like to create a separate portal where they can obtain service overviews, etc.The latest service overviews and technical requirements are not available without consulting with FPM or PDM. Even if you consult, depending on the timing, you may not be able to get it right away. The data you want is as follows.Now there's Copilot and other AI-related sites.Enterprise Mobility + Security - 技術ドキュメント Technical DocumentationM365 Security & Compliance - 技術ドキュメント Technical DocumentationMicrosoft Azure - 技術ドキュメントTechnical DocumentationMicrosoft Viva - ドキュメント DocumentMicrosoft Viva - 技術ドキュメントTechnical DocumentationOffice Client - 技術ドキュメントTechnical DocumentationPower BI Analytics - 技術ドキュメントTechnical DocumentationPowerApps Flow - 技術ドキュメントTechnical DocumentationSharePoint - 技術ドキュメントTechnical DocumentationTeams - 技術ドキュメントTechnical DocumentationWindows Client - 技術ドキュメントTechnical DocumentationWindows Client - 標準ドキュメントTechnical Documentation -
LXP Dashboard: SKUs of customers who already have E5 in the base data are handled by O365 のベースデータでE5を既に持っている顧客のSKUがO365で扱われている
Suggested by Shigetsugu Kurosawa – Accepted – 2 Comments
LXP Dashboard(Opportunities)で実態として該当しない顧客がオポチュニティとして表示されるため、SKUの判定ロジックを見直し、正しいSKUで扱われるように変えて欲しい。例) 既にME5をお持ちのお客様のSKUがO365と扱われているケースがあります。 Since customers who do not actually fall under this category are displayed as opportunities, I would like to see the SKU judgment logic reviewed and changed so that it is handled with the correct SKU.For example, there are cases where customers who already have ME5 have SKUs that are treated as O365. -
Copilot tab clarity on Secure Productivity health
Suggested by Ben Tappenden – Accepted – 0 Comments
It would useful when looking at the Copilot tab to see if the customer is an E3, E5 or E5 Expansion opportunity as well, and their Healthy/Unhealthy status for Secure Productivity. Whilst this can be obtained from the other tabs, currently as a partner you have to flick between the Copilot and Secure Productivity tabs or you need to have two different browser tabs open to see this information at the same time. When assessing an opportunity in the Copilot tab it would really help provide additional context to the partner on the other opportunity space from a Secure Productivity perspective as that will help shape the conversation they position with the customer. For example, if a customer appears as an opportunity to drive Copilot but actually they're not completely healthy from a Secure Productivity perspective (i.e. Unhealthy or At Risk) then that may become something that is factored into the overall positioning with the customer. Having that single pain of glass view would be very useful without having to switch between tabs all the time or have multiple windows open. -
Partner List Misalignment
Suggested by Ashwini ashwini – Accepted – 0 Comments
The partner list currently displayed in PSM Scorecard does not reflect the FY26 assignments. This discrepancy may lead to confusion in planning and reporting -
Missing Insights in PSM Scorecard Reports
Suggested by Ashwini ashwini – Accepted – 0 Comments
Despite being added last week, the latest insights and customer success stories are still not appearing in the report. -
MCI Workshop Count Discrepancy
Suggested by Ashwini ashwini – Accepted – 0 Comments
The reported number of MCI workshops is inconsistent with the field reporting count. This misalignment could impact performance tracking and resource allocation - example - Security LXP Dashboard - Power BI -
Insight Submission: Sentinel for SAP in Latin America
Suggested by Karen Karen Garber – Accepted – 0 Comments
Context:During the meeting, Leopoldo raised the topic of Sentinel for SAP, noting that many customers in Mexico and Latin America run SAP workloads on Azure or other clouds. There is uncertainty about the availability and effectiveness of partners who can deliver Sentinel for SAP solutions, and no clear customer demand or partner expertise was identified in the discussion. 1 2Problem Statement:There is a lack of visibility and partner capability for deploying and supporting Sentinel for SAP in the region. Enterprise sellers have reported a gap in qualified partners for Sentinel for SAP, which may limit Microsoft’s ability to address security needs for SAP environments and capture potential migration opportunities.Ask:Request engineering and partner teams to:Assess current partner readiness and expertise for Sentinel for SAP in Latin America.Identify and recommend partners with proven capabilities or interest in developing Sentinel for SAP solutions.Share best practices, enablement resources, and customer success stories to help build partner capacity and drive customer adoption for SAP security on Azure. -
Extend Incentive Milestone Period for Large &Gov
Suggested by Amanda Lima – Accepted – 0 Comments
Type: GTM Program Feedback: Partner PerformanceMeeting: Secure AI Productivity Feedback (Aug 27, 2025)Summary: Procurement cycles for large/government clients often exceed 12 months, making current incentive timelines misaligned.Recommendation: Extend milestone period to 18 months or introduce a grace period. -
Clarify FTA Scope and SLA Expectations for partners
Suggested by Amanda Lima – Accepted – 0 Comments
Type: FastTrack Regional Program ExecutionMeeting: FTA Brazil – FRP Alignment (Aug 26, 2025)Summary: Partners support multiple clients with limited Microsoft resources; scope and SLA clarity is needed.Recommendation: Define Partner assisted FTA scope and engagement expectations, including SLA expectations