-
Change Log for FastTrack Microsoft Learn Page
Suggested by Stephen Brown – New – 1 Comments
Is it possible to include a change log whenever the FastTrack Microsoft learn page is updated? Changes and updates are made fairly frequently throughout the year (Products and Capabilities, Entra, Sentinel, Office 365 sections), but it is not really clear what has been updated. FastTrack Center Benefit for Microsoft 365 - FastTrack – Microsoft 365 | Microsoft Learn -
Tech Plus Since the partner can no longer access the service, I would like to create a separate portal where the service summary can be obtained にパートナーがアクセスできなくなったので、サービス概要書等を入手できるポータルを別途作成してほしい
Suggested by Chie Kawaguchi – Rejected – 2 Comments
Tech Plus にパートナーがアクセスできなくなったので、サービス概要書等を入手できるポータルを別途作成してほしい最新のサービスの概要書、技術要件書などが、FPMやPDM等に相談しないと入手できない。相談してもタイミングによっては、すぐ入手できなくて困る場合がある。ほしいデータとしては下記。今は Copilot とか AI 関連のサイトもあれば。Since partners no longer have access to Tech Plus, I would like to create a separate portal where they can obtain service overviews, etc.The latest service overviews and technical requirements are not available without consulting with FPM or PDM. Even if you consult, depending on the timing, you may not be able to get it right away. The data you want is as follows.Now there's Copilot and other AI-related sites.Enterprise Mobility + Security - 技術ドキュメント Technical DocumentationM365 Security & Compliance - 技術ドキュメント Technical DocumentationMicrosoft Azure - 技術ドキュメントTechnical DocumentationMicrosoft Viva - ドキュメント DocumentMicrosoft Viva - 技術ドキュメントTechnical DocumentationOffice Client - 技術ドキュメントTechnical DocumentationPower BI Analytics - 技術ドキュメントTechnical DocumentationPowerApps Flow - 技術ドキュメントTechnical DocumentationSharePoint - 技術ドキュメントTechnical DocumentationTeams - 技術ドキュメントTechnical DocumentationWindows Client - 技術ドキュメントTechnical DocumentationWindows Client - 標準ドキュメントTechnical Documentation -
IDEA: Test/ideas and requests related to your experience
Suggested by Praveen Kumar Ganeshpandi – New – 0 Comments
Share insights, feedback, ideas and requests related to your experience with Microsoft products and/or your experience as a member of this community. -
LXP Dashboard: SKUs of customers who already have E5 in the base data are handled by O365 のベースデータでE5を既に持っている顧客のSKUがO365で扱われている
Suggested by Shigetsugu Kurosawa – Accepted – 2 Comments
LXP Dashboard(Opportunities)で実態として該当しない顧客がオポチュニティとして表示されるため、SKUの判定ロジックを見直し、正しいSKUで扱われるように変えて欲しい。例) 既にME5をお持ちのお客様のSKUがO365と扱われているケースがあります。 Since customers who do not actually fall under this category are displayed as opportunities, I would like to see the SKU judgment logic reviewed and changed so that it is handled with the correct SKU.For example, there are cases where customers who already have ME5 have SKUs that are treated as O365. -
PSM Partner Win Formula Template with FY26 priorities
Suggested by Dzheyda Bilgin – New – 0 Comments
PSMs currently have success plan templates; however, this year’s objective is to be integrated into PDM business plans as part of the pod. These business plans include draft slides for each solution area with FY26 priorities. While actions may evolve, having a draft slide, similar to Win Formula slides or the Azure PSM Growth Plan—would be highly valuable for our role, outlining priorities aligned to MCEM stages 4 and 5. PSMs can then add specific details, but this approach would simplify inclusion in the pod and create a standardized framework across all roles. It would also help overcome any potential resistance from PDMs by presenting a more professional and structured format. -
Provide ASPX learning session(webinar) for non-FT partners
Suggested by Dzheyda Bilgin – New – 0 Comments
With the rollout of ASPX to all partners, non-FastTrack partners now have access to the dashboard. While learning materials are available in the portal, GPS team members familiar with the platform have requested sessions for their partners by country/area.To avoid creating duplicate efforts for PSMs, a more efficient approach would be to organize a single webinar on how to use the dashboard. PSMs can then share the recording or link with GPS teams, ensuring all interested partners can access the training. -
MCI performance requirement exception
Suggested by Dzheyda Bilgin – New – 0 Comments
Partners have expressed concerns about the current performance measurement requirements in MCI engagements, particularly the expectation for customers to commit to license purchases before workshops are delivered. This creates hesitation among partners, who fear being penalized if the customer does not convert. As a result, some partners choose not to engage at all, missing opportunities to showcase the product and potentially influence customer decisions. To address this, would it be an option to allow 1–2 engagements per partner per year to be excluded from performance requirements? Maybe by adding criterias as can be used on education customers or the customers above x amount of seats. This would give partners the flexibility to deliver workshops to customers they believe have strong potential or genuine interest, even if those customers cannot confirm investment upfront, ultimately encouraging more proactive engagement and reducing missed opportunities. -
Copilot tab clarity on Secure Productivity health
Suggested by Ben Tappenden – Accepted – 0 Comments
It would useful when looking at the Copilot tab to see if the customer is an E3, E5 or E5 Expansion opportunity as well, and their Healthy/Unhealthy status for Secure Productivity. Whilst this can be obtained from the other tabs, currently as a partner you have to flick between the Copilot and Secure Productivity tabs or you need to have two different browser tabs open to see this information at the same time. When assessing an opportunity in the Copilot tab it would really help provide additional context to the partner on the other opportunity space from a Secure Productivity perspective as that will help shape the conversation they position with the customer. For example, if a customer appears as an opportunity to drive Copilot but actually they're not completely healthy from a Secure Productivity perspective (i.e. Unhealthy or At Risk) then that may become something that is factored into the overall positioning with the customer. Having that single pain of glass view would be very useful without having to switch between tabs all the time or have multiple windows open. -
Partner List Misalignment
Suggested by Ashwini ashwini – Accepted – 0 Comments
The partner list currently displayed in PSM Scorecard does not reflect the FY26 assignments. This discrepancy may lead to confusion in planning and reporting -
Missing Insights in PSM Scorecard Reports
Suggested by Ashwini ashwini – Accepted – 0 Comments
Despite being added last week, the latest insights and customer success stories are still not appearing in the report.